 | ||
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Florida |  1 |
| 2 | Alabama |  1 |
| 3 | Texas | |
| 4 | TCU | |
| 5 | Boise State | |
| 6 | Cincinnati | |
| 7 | Oregon | 2 |
| 8 | Ohio State | 2 |
| 9 | Iowa | 2 |
| 10 | Georgia Tech | 3 |
| 11 | Pittsburgh | 3 |
| 12 | Penn State | |
| 13 | Brigham Young | |
| 14 | Virginia Tech | 4 |
| 15 | Miami (Florida) | 5 |
| 16 | Houston | 2 |
| 17 | LSU | 1 |
| 18 | Southern Cal | 3 |
| 19 | West Virginia | |
| 20 | Oregon State | 2 |
| 21 | California | 2 |
| 22 | Oklahoma State | 7 |
| 23 | Nebraska | |
| 24 | Utah | 1 |
| 25 | Central Michigan | |
| Last week's ballot | ||
Dropped Out: North Carolina (#17), Clemson (#19), Mississippi (#24).
I wasn't trying to play the homer with Pitt, voting them four spots higher (at #11)than their highest ranking in the polls. I voted them ahead of Penn State, whose best win may be versus Temple, and ahead of three-loss teams Virginia Tech, Oregon State, and LSU mainly because Pitt has played decent teams in a BCS conference and has one fewer loss to this point. Plus Pitt's most recent loss was to a pretty good team who happens to be a rival and was on the road. Not exactly a bad loss. And if you STILL think I'm playing the homer card, I also only dropped Georgia Tech three spots as well. I don't subscribe to the theory that losing later means it should count more than losing earlier.
No comments:
Post a Comment